Book 30 minutes

From ticket to release, and back

Every change, checked against the whole product.

AI helps your team write code faster. Checking it hasn't kept up. Robotesta works out what each change must prove, writes and runs the tests, and brings the evidence to your release decision.

0:52 Watch the 60-second videoSam explains Robotesta, with sound

Bring one PR. Leave knowing what it would have broken.

PR #491 · Remove workspace member RO-218

Quality contract

What must be true for this change, worked out from the ticket, two earlier decisions, the approved design and the code.

  • A sole owner cannot be removed. Covered · passed
  • The member's audit history remains. Covered · passed
  • Owned resources are reassigned first. New check · passed
  • Access ends the moment a member is removed. New check · failed
Diagnosis

A product gap, not test drift. removeMember() never calls revokeSessions(), so a removed member stays signed in.

Evidence written back to RO-218 Release: a person decides

Teams we've worked with

  • ZidE-commerce
  • ZidPayPayments
  • MNT-HalanFintech
  • HALAFintech
  • KlivvrFintech
  • AzzrakSoftware

Why now

Code got faster. Checking didn't.

More change now moves through the same review, testing and QA capacity. This is what that does to a team, in four steps.

Baseline Faros measured againstWith AIEach tick is 1×, up to 4×

  1. 01 · Change

    AI multiplied the change.

    More features, fixes and experiments land every day.

    Pull requests merged≈ 2×

    +98% · Faros 2025

    Developers on teams with high AI adoption merged 98% more pull requests. Faros, The AI Productivity Paradox, 2025: 10,000+ developers, 1,255 teams.

    “We shipped three changes before lunch.”

  2. 02 · Bottleneck

    The queue moved downstream.

    The code is ready. Review, testing and QA are still catching up.

    Time reviewing pull requests≈ 1.9×

    +91% · Faros 2025

    Pull request review time rose 91%. Faros, The AI Productivity Paradox, 2025.
    Time in QA≈ 4×

    +300.6% · Faros 2026

    Time in QA is up 300.6%. Faros, The Speed Trap, 2026: 22,000 developers, 4,000 teams.

    “What else did this change touch?”

  3. 03 · Trade-off

    Teams start making compromises.

    Every change forces the same choice.

    Wait

    Review it. Test it. Verify it. Lose some of the speed.

    Push through

    Merge now. Check later. Move the risk downstream.

    “Do we have coverage for that path?”

  4. 04 · Rework

    The work doesn't disappear.

    What gets missed comes back as debugging, regressions, incidents and fixes.

    Incidents a month≈ 2.25×

    +125.4% · Faros 2026

    Monthly incidents are up 125.4%. Faros, The Speed Trap, 2026.

    “CI was green. Customer found it first.”

Fast coding only works if checking can keep up.

Speed moved forward. Quality work moved downstream, without the context the code was written from.

Sources: Faros, The AI Productivity Paradox, 2025 (10,000+ developers, 1,255 teams) and Faros, The Speed Trap, 2026 (22,000 developers, 4,000 teams).

The missing context

Software changes faster than a team can reconstruct what each change depends on.

Part of the bottleneck is volume. The part that lets problems through is context: the author didn't have it, the review didn't have it, and the tests were written from the same ticket.

Your product, around one change Illustrative
  • User flowWorkspace › Members › Remove
  • DecisionInvitations expire after 7 days
  • RequirementA workspace always keeps at least one owner.
  • CoverageOwner protection
  • IssueDuplicate audit rows on re-invite
  • Decision #61Access removal must be immediate.
  • RequirementInvite members by email
  • Codebasebilling-service
  • Issue #184A removed member kept authenticated access.
  • DesignMember list
  • The changeRO-218 · Remove workspace member
  • CoverageAudit history
  • Approved designReassign owned resources before removal.
  • DecisionAdmins cannot demote themselves
  • Productionmembership-service · 30 days
  • Codebasemembership-service · session-service · realtime authorization
  • User flowSettings › Ownership
  • Codebasenotification-service
  • Coverage · not coveredActive sessions are revoked on removal.
  • RequirementOwners can transfer ownership
  • DesignConfirmation dialog
What RO-218 depends on What nothing checks yet The rest of the product

Not what the change touches. What it was meant to do.

Robotesta reconstructs the product around each change before anything is written, and turns it into a quality contract: the list of what must be true.

How it works

It works out what must be true. Then it proves it.

One change, followed from the ticket to the release decision. Robotesta reads your stories, business rules, decisions, designs, code, tests and production signals, then does four things for every change, and keeps learning after it ships.

  1. 01 · Ticket

    Reviews the requirement

    Finds the missing rules before anyone builds.

    Jira · RO-218

    Can the only owner be removed? A workspace always keeps at least one owner.

  2. 02 · Pull request

    Reviews the pull request

    Checks the change against the whole product, not only the changed lines.

    GitHub · PR #491

    Decision #61 says access ends at once. Revoke sessions inside the removal transaction.

  3. 03 · Tests

    Writes and runs the tests

    Reuses the checks you have, writes the ones that are missing, and runs them.

    Run #218-5 · staging

    4 passed. 2 reused, 2 new.

  4. 04 · Release

    Prepares the release decision

    Puts the evidence in one view. A person says ship or hold.

    Members and ownership

    4 of 4 rules covered. No open findings. Sentry: no new issues.

05 · After release

Release is where the learning starts.

Once a change is live, Robotesta keeps watching. It reads production signals and what customers tell your support team, links each one to the change behind it, and turns it into checks for the next release. Your team decides what makes the cut.

Back to 01: the next ticket starts with what this release taught you.

  • Production · Sentry

    New errors in exports-worker after release 2.14.

    Becomes a check for the next change to scheduled exports.

  • Support · customer tickets

    Customers see duplicate audit rows after re-inviting a member.

    Becomes a rule in the quality contract for membership-service.

  • Usage · Google Analytics 4

    Bulk remove is the path admins use most.

    Gets checked first the next time members change.

Five rules it works by

  • Quality contract

    What must be true for a change, agreed before code is written.

  • Reuse first

    Your existing tests count. It writes only the checks that are missing.

  • Diagnose, not just fail

    A failed check says whether the product or the test is wrong, and where.

  • Evidence on the ticket

    Results go back to Jira and the pull request, where your team already looks.

  • A human decides

    Robotesta prepares the release decision. A person makes it.

RO-218 and PR #491 are illustrative. No customer data is shown.

Six people ship every change. You've heard all of them.

Robotesta gives each of them what they were missing.

“It’s a small change.”

Product owner

Shows what each story touches, before coding starts.

“Works on my machine.”

Developer

Reviews every PR in full context and writes the unit tests.

“All tests passed.”

Tester

Designs, runs and automates the tests, in one place.

“We’ll fix it in production.”

Engineering lead

Puts the release evidence in one view. You decide.

“Move fast and break things.”

Founder

Checks the rules and writes the tests as you build.

“You’re absolutely right!”

AI coding agent

Gives your agent the whole product context.

Where it works

Inside the tools your team already uses.

It reads from them, acts in them, and writes the evidence back to them.

Where it acts

  • Jira
  • GitHub
  • CI and the pull request gate
  • The Robotesta web app
  • CLI and API for coding agents

What it reads

  • Confluence · Figma
  • TestRail · Jest · Playwright
  • GitHub Actions · AWS
  • Sentry · PagerDuty
  • Google Analytics 4

What it accepts

  • OpenAPI
  • JUnit XML
  • OTLP
  • Files and CSV
  • Support tickets, as files or webhooks
  • REST and webhooks

Third-party names are shown to indicate compatibility only.

Pricing · early access

Start free. Pay as your team grows.

Every plan reviews requirements and pull requests, and writes and runs the tests. Plans differ in how many repositories, people and changes they cover.

Free forever

$0 forever

For one developer or a side project.

Get early access
Repositories
1
People
2
Changes a month
10
Evidence kept
1 month
  • Requirement review in Jira
  • Pull request review in GitHub
  • Writes and runs unit tests
  • Evidence written back to the ticket

Team

$49 a month

For a product team shipping every week.

Get early access
Repositories
5
People
10
Changes a month
30
Evidence kept
3 months
  • Everything in Free, plus:
  • Unit, integration and end-to-end tests
  • CI and pull request gate
  • Release decision view
  • Reads Confluence, Figma, TestRail and Sentry

Growth

$100 a month

For several teams and stricter release rules.

Get early access
Repositories
10
People
50
Changes a month
100
Evidence kept
6 months
  • Everything in Team, plus:
  • Release policies, such as “auth changes need executed evidence”
  • Production signals from Sentry, PagerDuty and Google Analytics 4
  • Evidence intake: OpenAPI, JUnit XML, OTLP, CSV and webhooks
  • CLI and API for coding agents

Enterprise

Custom

For many teams with their own requirements.

Book 30 minutes
Repositories
Custom
People
Custom
Changes a month
Custom
Evidence kept
Custom
  • Everything in Growth, plus:
  • Limits and evidence retention sized to your organization
  • Rollout planned with your engineering and QA leads
  • Onboarding with the Robotesta team

Robotesta is in early access: ask for a place and we'll get back to you. Prices in US dollars a month; limits reset monthly. Enterprise is priced with you.

Straight answers

What teams ask us first.

Does it replace our QA team?
No. It does the repetitive checking, so your testers can focus on judgement and the risky areas.
Does it catch everything?
No tool does. It shows what a change touches and what was tested, so the release decision is better informed.
How does it connect to our code?
Through the pull request and the tools you already use, like Jira and GitHub. We show the setup in the demo.
Who decides what ships?
A person. Robotesta brings the evidence; your team says ship or hold.
How much is it?
Free forever for one repository. Team is $49 a month and Growth $100 a month; Enterprise is priced with you. The limits are in Pricing above.
How do you handle our code and data?
Fair question. We walk you through security and data handling in the demo, and answer your security team’s questions there.

Bring one PR. Leave knowing what it would have broken.

Thirty minutes, your Jira, your repo. You leave with the quality contract for one real change: what must be true, what is already covered, and what Robotesta would check, before anything is written.

Book 30 minutes

Product, engineering, QA and technical leaders welcome. Or write to sam@robotesta.ai

Robotesta in 60 seconds

Read the transcript

AI made everything faster. Except knowing it works. Tickets, code, pull requests: they all move at AI speed now. Checking them still moves at human speed.

So verification becomes the bottleneck. Teams can wait, and lose the speed. Or rush, and lose the context: the requirement, the earlier decision, the edge case nobody wrote down. That's how problems reach production, and customers find them first.

Robotesta checks every change against the whole product. It reads the ticket, earlier decisions, the design and the code, and works out what must be true. Then it writes and runs the checks, and shows you what would break, and why.

The evidence goes to your release decision. Your team decides. After release, it learns from production and support, so the next change starts smarter.

Apply for early access at robotesta.ai. Bring one PR.